DC Metro Area Medical Malpractice Law Blog

Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, founding partner     

The DC Department of Health recently released a report, making clear that medical errors are killing more DC residents than all types of car and truck accidents combined.  Per the February, 2010 report, "The leading causes of preventable death in the District of Columbia...were tobacco use (estimated 860 deaths; 16.6 percent of total DC resident deaths), poor diet and physical inactivity (estimated 780 deaths; 15.1 percent), microbial (infectious) agents—excluding HIV—(estimated 240 deaths; 4.6 percent), alcohol consumption (estimated 150 deaths; 2.9 percent), firearms (estimated 140; 2.7 percent), and medical errors (estimated 140 deaths; 2.7 percent). 

According to the comprehensive study and report, motor vehicle accidents account for .6% of the overall deaths in DC--that's 4.5 times less than the deaths caused by preventable medical errors.

The complete report can be viewed by clicking here.

There is a lot of discussion in politics about "tort reform".  The term--"tort reform"--is actually a misnomer, and is better understood as "tort deform".   Some powerful business groups and industries wish to strip Americans of their rights and their access to justice when injured due to medical errors.  Instead of robbing Americans of their fundamental rights and compensating them for the devastating damages they incur as a result of medical negligence, the focus should be on preventing the medical errors in the first place.  That's true reform.

About the author:

Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, founding partner     

According to the Chicago Tribune, Baxter International Inc. announced a recall of its "in-home dialysis device that has been linked to serious injury reports and at least one death in the last two years." In addition, the "Food and Drug Administration has classified the action as a Class I recall, the agency's most serious, for the Baxter's HomeChoice and HomeChoice Pro peritoneal dialysis cyclers, because the device is causing an 'overfill' of fluid in the patient's stomach," states the Tribune report.

A Class I recall applies to problems that can cause serious adverse health consequences or death. According to an AP report, "Baxter said it is still investigating the source of the problems and is working on changes to labeling and software to prevent patient errors."  The company nevertheless claims that the "machines do not need to be physically returned to the company and can still be used."

Dow Jones Newswire reported on the recall as well.

If using a Baxter device, we urge you to speak with your doctor immediately to determine if it is safe for you to continue using it.  Your doctor should be aware of the problems and the consequential risks to be able to provide you with the information you need to make the best decision possible for your health.

About the author:

Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, founding partner     

The New York Times, in a front-page report, announced, "To help ensure that medical radiation is safe, Medicare insists that certain highly technical cancer treatments be administered only when a patient's radiation oncologist is present or nearby." Federal officials say physicians who fail to adequately supervise technicians during radiotherapy risk patient safety. But, the issue also "raises questions about financial incentives and the overuse of high-tech, and highly reimbursed, treatments" when "less advanced and cheaper ones would have served just as well."

As a result, "Congress passed an antikickback law designed to stop doctors from" unnecessarily ordering "tests or procedures in which they have a financial interest," according to the report.  In addition, "radiation safety will be the subject of a Congressional hearing Friday." For its part, "the American College of Radiology has said that self-referral endangers patients because doctors tend to order more tests."

Before undergoing any diagnostic test or invasive procedure, your doctor should describe all benefits and  risks of the procedure and he or she should explain all alternative options as well.

About the author:

 Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, founding partner     

The AP reported that "Drugmaker KV Pharmaceutical Co. says it will shut down its Ethex generic division, plead guilty to criminal charges" that the company failed to immediately notify "regulators of safety hazards."  The embattled company will "pay $27.6 million to resolve government investigations," according to the report.

The settlement requires Ethex to "plead guilty to two felony counts for failing to file 'field alerts' for two drugs, dextroamphetamine and propafenone," the St. Louis Post-Dispatch reports. In addition, "KV was ordered to stop making some time-release cough, cold, and gastrointestinal drugs in 2008," but despite that order, "the FDA said KV continued to make the drugs."

This smacks as another instance in which a big company decided to mock the law and put profits over safety.  There is no place for such greed in this country.  I hope the criminal consequences send a message to all greedy executives that they better change the way they do business and start putting people over profits.  Americans shouldn't be seriously injured or killed just so executives can pad their pockets.

About the author:

 Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, founding partner     

The front page of the New York Times reported that "Hundreds of people taking Avandia [rosiglitazone], a controversial diabetes medicine, needlessly suffer heart attacks and heart failure each month, according to confidential government reports." A Senate Finance Committee review cites internal FDA documents that highlight a dispute among regulators that "has been brewing for years but has been brought to a head by disagreement over a new clinical trial."

The Wall Street Journal reports that the Senate committee concluded that Glaxo was aware of the risks, but minimized the issue and attempted to suppress concerned physicians. The FDA's documents also indicate that agency scientists said the drug should be pulled from the market in 2008, but FDA chiefs rejected the recommendations. Now, agency commissioner Margaret Hamburg is expected to meet "with FDA scientists and outside experts to gain a full understanding...of all of the data and issues involved," a spokeswoman said.

The AP reported that the Senate committee is asking the FDA "why it allowed a clinical trial of Avandia to continue even after the agency estimated that the drug caused 83,000 heart attacks between 1999 and 2007." Glaxo agreed to an FDA request for "a six-year study between its drug and" the Pfizer diabetes drug Actos [pioglitazone] "to give a definitive picture of Avandia's safety."

If the senate report proves to be accurate, this once again smacks of a company putting profits over patient safety, leading to serious injuries and death.

If prescribed Avandia, please contcat your doctor immediately.  Your doctor should not prescribe any medication without first warning you of all known risks, and only if the benefits of teh medication outweigh the risks.

About the author:

 Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, founding partner     

The AP (1/27, Perrone) reports, "Federal health officials announced the recall of two million medical needles Tuesday because of a risk they can push bits of silicone into patients' bodies." The FDA "said Japanese manufacturer Nipro Medical Corp. has voluntarily recalled its Exel/Exelint Huber needles manufactured between January 2007 and August 2009."   Doctors, nurses, and patients should not be using these needles under any circumstances.

Bloomberg News (1/27, Peterson) reports that the "defect...might lead to fatal blockages of the main artery of the lung, the [FDA] said." The needles, which are intended "to give food and medicine to chronically ill patients," can "dislodge 'cores,' or slivers of silicon, from 'ports' under the skin and release the material into the bloodstream, FDA officials said." Jon Casamento, deputy director of the Solid and Fluid Mechanics Division at the FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health, said the "defective needles...may cause tissue damage and inadequate drug delivery."

Regulators have not received reports that the needles released silicon or other foreign chemicals into patients, but the defect is difficult for doctors to detect, Dow Jones Newswire (1/27, Favole) reports.

CNN (1/27, Young) reports that the FDA "said anyone using the products should stop immediately and return any unused needles to Exelint." The agency indicated that it is conducting investigations "of needles from 20 companies," of which 10 have already been completed. "The FDA said it has sent letters to all Huber manufacturers asking them to address any design or manufacturing problems."

About the author:

 Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, founding partner     

ev3 Endovascular, Inc. and FDA notified healthcare professionals of a Class I Recall of the Trailblazer Support Catheter. According to the recall, "This device may crack near the radiopaque marker band. This may result in serious patient injury, including insufficient oxygen supply to the tissues, damage to blood vessels, heart attack, limb amputation, unplanned surgery, and/or death."

If using a catheter, please contact your doctor immediately to be sure it is not part of the recall.  If you know you are using a Trailblazer Support Catheter, please stop using it right away, and obtain an alternative product.

About the author:

Posted by Catherine D. Bertram                                                        

On December 31, 2009, the FDA issued a warning to consumers and medical professionals, "especially pregnant or breastfeeding women, to avoid consuming a product called “Nzu”, taken as a traditional remedy for morning sickness,because of the potential health risks from high levels of lead and arsenic, noted on laboratory analysis by Texas DSHS. Exposure to lead can result in a number of harmful effects, and a developing child is particularly at risk of effects on the brain and nervous system. Arsenic is a carcinogen, and excessive long-term exposure to it has been associated with a range of adverse health effects, including cancers of the urinary bladder, lung and skin. Nzu, which is sold at African specialty stores is also called Calabash clay, Calabar stone, Mabele, Argile and La Craie. It generally resembles balls of clay or mud and is usually sold in small plastic bags with a handwritten label identifying it as “Nzu” or “Salted Nzu.” Anyone who has been ingesting the product should contact their health care provider."

Any adverse events that may be related to use should be reported to the FDA's MedWatch Safety Information and Adverse Event Reporting Program online by clicking here or by phone at 1-800-332-1088.

 If you have any questions about injuries related to this medication, or any other medication, you can call our firm for more information about your legal rights.  Click here to contact us online or call us at 202-463-3030.

About the author:

Catherine Bertram is board certified in civil trials and was recently nominated as a 2010 Super Lawyer for Washington, D.C.  Ms. Bertram has 20 years of trial experience and is unique in that she was formerly the Director of Risk Management for Georgetown University Hospital so she brings a wealth of knowledge to her practice including how hospitals should be run and what doctors and nurses can do to protect patients.   She is a partner with the firm and devotes her practice to the representation of patients and families of loved ones who have been injured or lost due to medical errors.  Ms. Bertram lectures regularly to lawyers and health care providers, nationally and locally,  regarding patient safety, medical negligence and other related issues. She has also recently published a chapter in a medical textbook.   She can be reached by email at cbertram@reganfirm.com or by phone 202-822-1875 in her office in Washington, D.C.

 Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, founding partner     

The AP reports that officials with the Food and Drug Administration warned doctors recently that "about 11 recalled lots of an intravenous hypertension drug made by the Medicines Co. are contaminated with bits of steel." According to the agency, the particles "could potentially disrupt blood flow to the brain, kidney, liver heart and lungs." Medicines Co. recalled the affected lots of Cleviprex (clevidipine butyrate).

If you believe you have been prescribed this drug, contact your doctor immediately.

About the author:

 Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, founding partner     

Bloomberg News (12/16, O'Reilly, Feeley) reports, "Pfizer Inc. asked a judge to order the removal of an Internet video about its menopause medicines that the company says is misleading and aimed at swaying potential jurors in future trials over the pills." The video, called "Prempro News Segment," was posted on YouTube.com by "plaintiffs' lawyers who recently won more than $78 million in damages in a Pennsylvania trial over Pfizer's Prempro hormone-replacement drug."

At issue in that case was whether the "menopause drugs helped cause" the plaintiff's breast cancer. In the video, "breast-cancer victims discuss their cases," while the attorneys "accuse Wyeth of minimizing the risks of Prempro." According to Pfizer's lawyers, "Pennsylvania rules governing lawyer ethics prohibit lawyers from making pre-trial statements to the press that could 'prejudice' an upcoming case."

About the author:

 Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, founding partner     

A massive recall of swine flu vaccine doses drew national attention recently when it was announced by the Center for Disease Control.  ABC World News (12/15, story 6, 0:20, Gibson) reports that federal health officials "are recalling 800,000 children doses of swine flu vaccine...made by Sanofi Pasteur." NBC Nightly News (12/15, story 2, 0:35, Williams) reported that the doses "are less potent than they should have been."

The Los Angeles Times (12/16, Maugh) reports that Centers for Disease Control and Prevention director Dr. Anne Schuchat said the recall was "non-safety-related," and was "part of a routine quality assurance program." Schuchat emphasized that "children who received the vaccine do not need to be re-immunized," but the agency "wanted to make sure that doses that weren't already given won't be." The Washington Post (12/16, Stein, Laris) reports that "most of the vaccine, which was distributed nationwide in November, has probably already been used."

Bloomberg News (12/16, Randall) reports that Sanofi "began delivering swine flu vaccine in the US in September, with the bulk of deliveries expected in the fourth quarter." The United States "has ordered 75 million doses from the Paris- based company." CQ HealthBeat (12/16, Norman) reports that the problem was identified during "ongoing quality assessments" made by the drugmaker. The New York Times (12/16, A28, Mcneil) reports that Dr. Schuchat "said the vaccine was fully potent at release but dropped by about 12 percent in follow-up tests." In a story appearing in some form on over 320 news websites, the AP (12/16, Stobbe) reports that Jesse Goodman, the FDA's deputy commissioner for science and public health, said the problem may be related to the antigen sticking to the walls of children's pre-filled syringes.

USA Today (12/16, Sternberg) reports that the affected vaccine, "packaged in half-dose amounts meant for children 6 months to nearly 3 years old, represents about 1% of the nation's H1N1 vaccine supply." Sanofi spokesman Len Lavenda said the doses comprise roughly "18% of the 4.5 million doses in prefilled syringes made by Sanofi for children in that age group." Lavenda commented that officials were "baffled" by the weakened vaccine, adding "we can't remember a time when flu vaccine lost potency." The Wall Street Journal (12/16, Dooren) reports that Sanofi will be notifying providers to return any unused doses.

Reuters (12/16, Fox) also reported on this story, while Time (12/16, O'Callaghan) mentioned the recall in their "Wellness" blog.

Please be careful when taking a vaccine or allowing a loved one to be injected.  We urge you to speak with your doctor about all pros and cons of any drug before ingesting it.

About the author:

 Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, founding partner     

The CBS Evening News reported, "The problem of too much radiation during CT scans may be more widespread than anyone thought." CBS further confirmed that "new research...found a wide variation in radiation dose for the most common CT scan like abdomen, pelvis, and chest. A survey of four hospitals found some patients received 13 times more radiation than others for the same type of scan."   Over-radiation can be very dangerous.

NBC Nightly News, referring to a study, stated that "researchers calculated that 72 million CT scans are performed in this country a year and concluded that could lead to 29,000 excess cancers and 15,000 excess deaths a year in the future."  The study NBC cited was published in the Archives of Internal Medicine. 

A second study, in the same journal, of over 1,000 patients at four hospitals, showed that 1 out of 270 women and 1 out of 600 men suffer from cancer as a result of undergoing a single heart scan at age 40, the Wall Street Journal reports. According to the report, researchers who performed the study noted that the differences in radiation doses may be a result of the difference in technology from one medical provider to another as well as a lack of standardized settings.

Bloomberg News reports that in the National Cancer Institute study, "the authors predicted that lung cancer will be the most common radiation-related cancer followed by colon cancer and leukemia." In response to these study, the FDA has "issued interim regulations Dec. 7 requiring closer monitoring of CT scans after more than 250 cases of exposure to excess radiation were reported since October."

Before undergoing a CT scan, you should get sound medical advice from an experienced physician who is familiar with the risks and benefits of the procedure.  If undergoing a scan, be sure the facility has technologically advanced equipment, so your exposure to radiation is minimized to the extent possible.  Your doctors should be advising you of all risks associated with the procedure, as well as all options available to you, so you can make the best health decision you can.  Your doctors should also be using equipment that is safe and in excellent working condition.

I wish you good health and happiness.

About the author:

 Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, founding partner     

Bloomberg.com reports that GlaxoSmithKline "has settled 450 suicide cases for about $390 million and 600 birth defect cases for unspecified amounts." According to the report, "The company has also paid out about $400 million in antitrust cases since 2003."

Many people who have taken Paxil have been subjected to an increased risk for suicide and birth defects.  The extent of the increased risk has never been disclosed. 

I represent victims of dangerous products.  Far too often companies put profits over people, placing into the marketplace drugs that have not been properly tested.  We hope that companies will put people over profits and be sure their products are safe before they are sold.

Before taking any medication, be sure to consult with a physician.  Your physician should also inform you of all risks and benefits of a medication before you ingest it, so that you can make the best health decisions you can.

About the author:

 Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, founding partner     

The FDA has announced that a California-based company--organicgirl produce--has recalled 120 cartons of its 5.75 oz Berries & Balsamic Salad "because it may contain an incorrect condiment packet with an unlabeled allergen for walnuts."

"The product is packaged in plastic trays in a 6-count carton, UPC 895203-001332, product lot number 31B073830, with Use-By Date of December 16, 2009."  If you have an allergy to walnuts, do not eat this product.  Doing so would "run the risk of serious or life-threatening allergic reaction," says the FDA.

If you purchased the recalled product, you are urged to return it to the place you bought it from for a full refund. If you have any questions, you may also contact organicgirl produce at 1-831-758-7810.

It is common for people to have allergic reactions to all kinds of foods.  That is why it is critically important for all food suppliers to carefully label what the product contains.  Without appropriate warnings, public health is compromised. 

Many people die every year as a result of food allergies.  If you have an allergy to a food product, read labels carefully.  If eating at a restaurant, ask your server to confirm the absence of the product you are allergic to when ordering.

Enjoy your meals, but please be careful to ingest only what you know is safe.

About the author:

 Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, founding partner     

 Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, founding partner     

The AP (12/11, Tanner) reports that "in 2005, Illinois legislators...passed a measure requiring hospitals to report the deadliest kind" of medical errors, but "the law has yet to be implemented -- and it likely won't be for at least another year." Illinois "budget woes and foot-dragging by special interests are among reasons cited for the long delay." However, "there are finally glimmers of progress. That includes the recent launch of a related state website that tracks hospital infection rates and staff levels, and the imminent start of a search for a vendor to help put the law in place."

Ten years ago, a landmark report proved that medical mistakes kill up to 98,000 Americans yearly. Only a handful of states have decided to do something about it, Minnesota being the first in 2003.  In 2005, Illinois modeled a law after Minnesota's.  Four years later, the law has still not been implemented.  Why?  Foot-dragging by special interest groups.  Finally, though, some progress is being made, including " the recent launch of a related state Web site that tracks hospital infection rates and staff levels, and the imminent start of a search for a vendor to help put the law in place."

According to the AP report, "The law will require hospitals to publicly report so-called "never" mistakes. These are mostly preventable errors with potentially life-threatening consequences -- like the wrong-knee surgery Krzysztof Kordes says Chicago-area doctors performed on him last year or the forgotten sponge left inside a Plainfield woman during breast tumor surgery."

A few things the law requires:

• hospitals required to report major medical errors within 30 days to the state's public health department
• list of hospitals and mistakes will be posted online
• hospitals required to determine cause of errors and to develop corrective plan

These kinds of laws should be in every state in our country.  Medical providers should not bow to special interest groups.  Sharing more, not less, following an adverse event is the only way to truly minimize future medical errors. 

Encourage your legislators to work hard to implement strong laws that clearly work to open communication and spur better, safer health practices.

About the author:

 Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, founding partner     

Dow Jones Newswires (12/8, Dooren) reported that Thomas Laughren, the director of FDA's division of psychiatric products, said Tuesday that the agency is weighing tougher warning labels for antipsychotics that might cause weight gain and diabetes.  According to the report, "the agency has asked manufacturers of drugs like Seroquel, Abilify and Zyprexa for all of the information they have on metabolic side effects such as increases in blood glucose" to determine whether warnings need to be improved.  This comes in the wake of concerns of how antipsychotic medication has been effecting children in particular.

Like all drugs, antipsychotic medication should never be taken without a doctor's prescription, and a physician should never prescribe this medication unless it is in the best interest of the patient and only after the patient has been fully informed of all of the risks and benefits of the drug. 

About the author:

 Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, founding partner     

The American Association for Justice has published a primer on the medical malpractice debate.  It comprehensively shows how special interest groups have perpetuated myths in an effort to strip Americans of their rights in order to pad their profits.  Here are some of the findings:

• Myth #1: There are too many “frivolous” malpractice lawsuits
  

• Myth #2: Malpractice claims drive up health care costs.

• Myth #3: Doctors are fleeing.

• Myth #4: Malpractice claims drive up doctors’ premiums.

• Myth #5: Tort reform will lower insurance rates.

It is widely accepted that approximately 98,000 Americans die every year as a result of medical errors.  That's like two 747 airplanes full of passengers crashing to the ground every day for a year.  Yet, some legislators want to strip innocent victims of their constitutional rights, including limiting their recoveries, instead of focusing on preventing future errors. 

Our leaders should be fighting for safer drugs, safer hospitals, better medical practices, and a safer American health system.  We must put people over profits.

To read the publication, please click here.

About the author:

 Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, founding partner     

The Associated Press has reported today that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) "still hasn't restructured its staff to better monitor drug safety, more than three years after experts recommended key changes in the wake of the Vioxx scandal."  According to the report, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) will release a report today indicating that FDA officials "have made some changes to drug oversight," although the agency "continues to give the bulk of its decision-making power to scientists who approve new drugs, rather than those who monitor the side effects of drugs on the market."  Consequently, the GAO "calls on the FDA to set a timetable for transferring new responsibilities to the surveillance office."

In response, the FDA "said major decisions about drug safety are delegated to the new drugs division because that is 'where staff with the broadest expertise and experience' on product safety issues reside," according to the AP report.

We urge the FDA to ramp up its surveillance of drugs, and we implore pharmaceutical companies to be sure their products are safe before placing them into the marketplace.  Drugs are obviously important, but manufacturers need to put people over profits.  No drug should enter the marketplace until it has been thoroughly tested and until its side-effects are fully understood.

Before taking any medication, please confer with your doctor.  Know all risks and benefits of a drug before taking it.

We wish you good health.

About the author:

 Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, founding partner     

The Los Angeles Times reports that "Bayer Healthcare is recalling 100,000 packages of Alka-Seltzer cold capsules because some do not properly display warning information about drowsiness."  The recalls pertains to packages of Alka-Seltzer Plus Day & Night Liquid Gels, according to the report.

"Company spokeswoman Tricia McKernan said the problem was caused by human error during the printing process. McKernan said the machinery used to make the labeling had to be shut down and manually restarted during the production for the affected lot."

If you have purchased these medications from lot 296939L--a lot that was distributed nationwide--please stop using the product and contact Bayer .  The manufacturer's phone number is (800) 986-3307, and they will provide a refund.

Be sure never to operate heavy machinery, drive a car, or engage in any dangerous activity while taking medication that has the potential to make you drowsy.

About the author:

 Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, founding partner     

The American Association for Justice has published a paper that concisely and clearly debunked the myths about medical malpractice which has been spread by business interest groups aimed at putting profits over people.  In the first of a series of papers, Public Citizen debunks the following "five myths: 

• Myth #1: There are too many “frivolous” malpractice lawsuits.

Fact: There’s an epidemic of medical negligence, not lawsuits.  Only one in eight people injured by medical negligence ever file suit.  Civil filings have declined eight percent over the last decade, and are less than one percent of the whole civil docket.  A 2006 Harvard study found that 97 percent of claims were meritorious, stating, “portraits of a malpractice system that is stricken with frivolous litigation are overblown.”

• Myth #2: Malpractice claims drive up health care costs.

Fact: According to the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, the total spent defending claims and compensating victims of medical negligence was just 0.3% of health care costs, and the Congressional Budget Office and Government Accountability Office have made similar findings.

• Myth #3: Doctors are fleeing.

Fact: Then where are they going?  According to the American Medical Association’s own data, the number of practicing physicians in the United States has been growing steadily for decades. Not only are there more doctors, but the number of doctors is increasing faster than population growth.  Despite the cries of physicians fleeing multiple states, the number of physicians increased in every state, and only four states saw growth slower than population growth; these four states all have medical malpractice caps.

• Myth #4: Malpractice claims drive up doctors’ premiums.

Fact: Empirical research has found that there is little correlation between malpractice payouts and malpractice premiums paid by doctors. A study of the leading medical malpractice insurance companies’ financial statements by former Missouri Insurance Commissioner Jay Angoff found that these insurers artificially raised doctors’ premiums and misled the public about the nature of medical negligence claims.  A previous AAJ report on malpractice insurers found they had earnings higher than 99% of Fortune 500 companies.

• Myth #5: Tort reform will lower insurance rates.

Fact:  Tort reforms are passed under the guise that they will lower physicians’ liability premiums. This does not happen. While insurers do pay out less money when damages awards are capped, they do not pass the savings along to doctors by lowering premiums. Even the most ardent tort reformers have been caught stating that tort reform will have no effect on insurance rates."

It is widely accepted that approximately 98,000 Americans die every year as a result of medical errors.  That's like two 747 airplanes full of passengers crashing to the ground every day for a year.  Yet, some legislators want to strip innocent victims of their constitutional rights, including limitibg their recoveries, instead of focusing on preventing future errors. 

Don't let your legislative representatives takes your rights away just so some special interest groups can pad their profits.  Fight for safer hospitals, better medical practices, and a safer American health system.  We must put people over profits.

About the author:

 Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, founding senior partner     

The AP recently reported,  "A consumer advocacy group is petitioning the government to ban the weight loss pill Meridia [sibutramine] because a recent study suggests it increases the risk of heart attack, stroke, and death." In a letter to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the consumer watch-dog--Public Citizen--calls on the agency "to pull Abbott Laboratories' drug from the US market," citing results from "a 10,000-patient study" that "showed a slightly higher risk of heart-related problems in patients taking Meridia...compared with a dummy pill."

The FDA, however, "said it was 'making no conclusions about the preliminary findings' when they were released last month." The agency "previously rejected a 2002 petition from Public Citizen to withdraw Meridia," saying "it wanted to wait for the findings of the 10,000-patient study."

We will soon see how the FDA responds to the study. In the meantime, please be very careful when taking any medication.  You should always get competent, expert medical advice for ingesting any medication.  Be sure, too, that your doctor fully explains all risks associated with certain medications so that you can make a wise decision about what's best for you and your body.
      

About the author:

By Catherine D. Bertram, Esquire                                

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration, FDA, issued an updated warning to health care professionals today regarding excessive radiation exposure for an additional 50 patients during CT brain perfusion scans.  The warning is as follows:

"The FDA, working with state and local health authorities, has identified at least 50 additional patients who were exposed to excess radiation of up to eight times the expected level during their CT perfusion scans. These cases so far involve more than one manufacturer of CT scanners. Some of these patients reported hair loss or skin redness following their scans. High doses of radiation can cause cataracts and increase the risk of some forms of cancer.
On the basis of its investigation to date, the FDA is providing interim recommendations for imaging facilities, radiologists, and radiologic technologists to help prevent additional cases of excess exposure.

These recommendations include:
•    Facilities assess whether patients who underwent CT perfusion scans received excess radiation.
•    Facilities review their radiation dosing protocols for all CT perfusion studies to ensure that the correct dosing is planned for each study.
•    Facilities implement quality control procedures to ensure that dosing protocols are followed every time and the planned amount of radiation is administered.
•    Radiologic technologists check the CT scanner display panel before performing a study to make sure the amount of radiation to be delivered is at the appropriate level for the individual patient.
•    If more than one study is performed on a patient during one imaging session, practitioners should adjust the dose of radiation so it is appropriate for each study."

You can review the MedWatch safety summary, including a link tlo the FDA News Release, by clicking here.

About the author:

Catherine Bertram is board certified in civil trials.  Ms. Bertram has 20 years of trial experience and is unique in that she was formerly the Director of Risk Management for Georgetown University Hospital so she brings a wealth of knowledge to her practice including how hospitals should be run and what doctors and nurses can do to protect patients.   She is a partner with the firm and devotes her practice to the representation of patients and families of loved ones who have been injured or lost due to medical errors.  Ms. Bertram lectures regularly to lawyers and health care providers, nationally and locally,  regarding patient safety, medical negligence and other related issues. She can be reached by email at cbertram@reganfirm.com or by phone 202-822-1875. 

Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, Esquire

The New York Times reported that according to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), "Vials of five different Genzyme drugs for rare diseases may be contaminated with tiny particles of steel, rubber or fiber that could potentially harm patients."  However, "the FDA and Genzyme said that there had been no reports of patients being harmed by particles and that the problem affected less than one percent of the vials."  Although Dr. Jason Woo, an FDA official, stated, "We do not believe this is a wide-scale problem, but we do not have information that fully defines the scope," patients and doctors are concerned.

According to the report, the FDA has confirmed that "the products would remain on the market, because there are few alternative treatments," the AP (11/14, Perrone) reported. The agency has strongly advised physicians to "closely inspect vials for particles before injecting them into patients."  If exposed to contaminated vials, patients may experience "potential allergic reactions, blood clots, and other problems," states the report. 

 About the author:

Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, Esquire

The Associated Press (AP) recently reported that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) "says it confirmed three new cases of a potentially lethal brain inflammation linked to the multiple sclerosis drug Tysabri [natalizumab]."  According to the FDA, the reports "are the first confirmed new cases since June."  The condition is known as progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, or PML.  The report states that the FDA has confirmed that since mid-2006 there have been 13 reported cases of PML.  The AP adds that "the FDA says the risk appears to increase as patients remain on Tysabri" and all "the PML cases are linked to its use in multiple sclerosis," although the drug is also marketed to treat Chron's disease as well.

According to the AP report, Tysabri  "was approved in November 2004 and pulled from the market the next year due to PML reports. It was reintroduced in July 2006, and Biogen said it is used by 43,000 patients."

Like all drugs, Tysabri, which is marketed by Biogen Idec Inc. and Elan Corp. PLC, should never be taken without a doctor's prescription, and a physician should never prescribe this medication unless it is in the best interest of the patient and only after the patient has been fully informed of all of the risks and benefits of the drug.
 

About the author:

Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, Esquire

According to a Bloomberg report, a former GlaxoSmithKline executive testified under oath that the drug company knew as early as 2001 that its anti-depressant drug--Paxil--could cause birth defects in the fetuses of pregnant women.  It has been alleged that this information was withheld from the public so the company could maximize profits at teh expense of public health.  The reports notes that in a videotaped deposition, former Glaxo drug-safety executive Jane Nieman stated that the company was “almost certain” by 2001 that Paxil was to blame for a certain heart defect that caused women to abort their fetuses. 

The drug generated about $942 million in sales last year alone.   We have no problem with companies making money--that's America.  What's un-American is putting profits over people.  No company should ever risk public health in a greedy effort to pad profits.  Many lawsuits against the drug manufacturer are pending, and we expect that the truth will be revealed and that the victims' suits will help protect all Americans from corporate greed. 

 About the author:

Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, Esquire

The AP (9/17, Johnson) reports that the FDA has determined that "[m]akers of injected promethazine, a sedative also used to treat nausea and vomiting, are being required to put the strongest warning possible on the product because it can cause tissue damage leading to amputation." FDA regulators said that "makers of generic promethazine will have to put a 'black box' warning at the top of the detailed package insert explaining that when the drug is administered incorrectly, it can damage skin severely, including causing gangrene."

We urge our readers to be very careful when taking this drug.  It is vitally important that you refrain from using it unless directed by a doctor, who is responsible for understanding all of the risks and benefits of the drug.  The risks should be communicated to you by your doctor before the physician prescribes the medication.
 

About the author:

Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, Esquire

In a segment on CNN's "Anderson Cooper 360" (9/15), the immediate past-president of the American Association of Justice, Les Weisbrod, and another past-president, Todd Smith, addressed the notion of placing artificial caps on medical malpractice claims.  Weisbrod declared such a cap to be unconstitutional and made the well-known point that there is no evidence to show that such a cap would lower health-care spending.  Smith countered the notion that frivolous cases are brought by trial attorneys by stating the obvious--that lawyers have no logical reason whatsoever to take a case with no chance of winning.

Medical malpractice cases are extraordinarily expenses to litigate.  As a medical malpractice lawyer, I routinely advance hundreds of thousands of dollars on my clients' behalf, knowing that if the case fails, I lose all of that money since I never allow my clients to pay me back my advanced expenses in the absence of a favorable resolution.  To bring a frivolous suit would not only lead to financial ruin, but it exposes a lawyer to serious sanctions that can be imposed by the presiding judge and the Office of Bar Counsel that oversees attorney conduct.  Simply put, the idea that doctors face a barrage of frivolous suits is a myth.

Those with special interests need to recognize that too many Americans are killed or severely and permanently injured as a result of medical errors every year.  We need to focus on reducing medical mistakes.  The rights of victims of wrongdoing, often the most vulnerable in our nation, should never be stripped or capped.

About the author:

Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, Esquire

According to an AP (9/16) report, Pharmacia and Upjohn, a subsidiary of Pfizer, "has pleaded guilty to illegally promoting the pain killer Bextra [valdecoxib]" as part of "a settlement agreement announced earlier this month, when prosecutors slapped" Pfizer "with a record-breaking $2.3 billion in fines for illegal drug promotions."  In addition, Bloomberg News (9/16, O'Reilly) reports that, according to the United States Department of Justice, "US District Judge Douglas P. Woodlock in Boston took the plea...but deferred a decision on formally accepting it until a sentencing hearing on Oct. 16."

All too often we hear about drug companies, insurers, and other entities that put profits over people.  Innovation is essential, but no company should ever seek money at the expense of public health and well-being.  Such conduct is reprehensible and dangerous.  Access to justice through the civil jury system is what allows for proper checks and balances.  If gives people a fair voice to speak out against corporate corruption, and it allows the innocent victims of corporate greed to obtain fair and just compensation for all of their harms and losses.

About the author:

Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, Esquire

According to a recent Danish study, women who undergo hormone replacement therapy after menopause are at a meaningfully higher risk of developing ovarian cancer.  A Reuters report states that the study, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, comments that women who took hormone replacements were 38 percent more likely to develop ovarian cancer than those who did not.  This follows a study that was conducted ion 2002 by the Women’s Health Initiative, which produced similar findings.

We encourage our readers to be very careful when taking any medication.  No women should undergo hormone replacement therapy or other kind of therapy without first seeking the advice of medical experts.  Doctors should warn patients of potential side-effects and should not prescribe drugs unless it is proper to do so in light of all risks and benefits.

About the author:

Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, Esquire

Bayer reached an agreement with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2008, forcing the company to pay for a $20 million ad campaign to correct the company's history of overstating the benefits of its oral contraceptive--Yaz--and downplaying its risks.  The FDA determined that Yaz carries additional risks as compared to other contraceptives because the drug contains drospirenone, a progestin, which can increase a woman's potassium to dangerous levels.  Increased levels of potassium can lead to many adverse side-effects including blot clots, which can then lead to stroke, heart attack, or other serious condition. 

Before taking any drug, please be sure to consult with your doctor and pharmacist.  Physicians must take affirmative steps to be aware of all side-effects of the medications they prescribe so their patients do not suffer adverse, otherwise avoidable, consequences.

About the author:

Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, Esquire

The FDA has warned consumers not to buy or use Hardcore Energize Bullet or New Whey liquid products sold in test tube-like vials, as a result of suspected product tampering. The products are being recalled.

According to the FDA, "The suspected tampering involved a utility knife blade found in one vial of Hardcore Energize Bullet drink, manufactured in the United States and sold in Canada, and another blade in one vial of New Whey liquid products, manufactured and sold in the United States."

Both of the products--Hardcore Energize Bullet and New Whey liquid products--are manufactured by Protica Inc., of Whitehall, Pa. The company is investigating this incident.

To read the entire warning, click here.

Do not use or purchase these items.  To do so would expose you to serious health risks.  Be safe.

About the author:

Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, Esquire

Doctors fail to report clinically significant findings to their patients in more than seven percent (7%) of the cases, according to the Associated Press, relying on a new study published Monday in the Archives of Internal Medicine.  Physicians' use of electronic medical records tended to lower instances of failures to inform.  The frequency of errors is higher in practices that used a combination of electronic and paper records, as opposed to practices that relied on only paper or only electronic records, reports Nicholas Bakalar of the New York Times.    

We encourage doctors to utilize the electronic technology now available to better communicate with patients and other physicians regarding a patient's symptoms and conditions.  Reckless record-keeping leads to needless deaths and injuries.  There is a crisis in this country--too many Americans die each year as a result of hospital and doctor errors.  Nearly 100,000 people die every year as a result of hospital mistakes alone.  Safety needs to be a priority as we move forward.

About the author:

Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, Esquire

Shannon Pettypiece reports for Bloomberg that Matrixx Initiatives Inc. announced that it failed to turn over to U.S. regulators about 800 consumer complaints concerning serious side-effects linked to its Zicam nasal spray and swabs, which have been withdrawn.

According to the report, "Matrixx, based in Scottsdale, Arizona, stopped selling the cold remedies on June 16 after the Food and Drug Administration warned consumers the treatments may cause a loss of smell. Matrixx today defended its products and called the FDA warning 'a surprise,' during a conference call with analysts."

The 800 complaints were unearthed only after the FDA performed a routine inspection found 800 reports of consumer concerns this past May.  William Hemelt, acting president and chief operating officer of Matrixx, said that he was informed that  his compnay did not need to report the complaints despite a 2007 regulation requiring companies to turn over reports of serious side effects, arguing that the regulation didn't apply. 

“We have complaints but we weren’t required to send them,” Hemelt said. “At least we didn’t believe we were required to send them and we based that on an opinion of counsel who looked at the FDA regulation and said no, it doesn’t fit.”

The FDA reported that doctors and consumers have linked a permanent loss of smell to the us of the medications.

When companies withhold critically important information it smacks of putting profits over people.  Safety and public health should always be the paramount concern of drug companies. 

Our firm has experience pursing cases for patients that involve tragic medication errors,  pharmacy mix ups and unsafe medications.  If you think you have been injured by a defective product, we encourage you to read a portion of a book regarding products liability authored by senior partner Salvatore Zambri.

For information about your legal rights, please contact Mr. Zambri at 202-822-1899 or email him at szambri@reganfirm.com.

Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, Esquire 

According to a Reuters article, reported by James Pethkoukis, experts have determined that the FDA's approval process needs to be improved to better protect patients from dangerous risks.

At a congressional hearing, Representative Frank Pallone, who chairs a House Energy and Commerce subcommittee, stated, "There is evidence of an approval system that is broken -- that its standards, its procedures and its rules don't meet modern needs of getting medical devices to those in need with confidence in their safety." The article further comments that "Marcia Crosse, healthcare director for the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office, said various shortcomings 'raise concerns' about the FDA's pre-approval reviews and post-approval monitoring 'that are necessary for ensuring the safety and effectiveness of medical devices.'"

Although Americans benefit greatly from new products, the FDA must do more to protect those who will be using the products in the end--the patients. Without serious oversight, great harm can result.

Our firm has experience pursing cases for patients that involve tragic medication errors, pharmacy mix ups and unsafe medications.  If you think you have been injured by a defective product, we encourage you to read a portion of a book regarding products liability  authored by senior partner Salvatore Zambri.

For information about your legal rights, please click here or contact Mr. Zambri at 202-822-1899.

Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, Esquire and Catherine Bertram, Esquire

Recently, MedPage Today reported that "The FDA issued an alert regarding the risk of increased mortality in stable liver transplant patients who switch from a calcineurin inhibitor-based (CNI) immunosuppressive regimen to sirolimus (Rapamune)."  It was noted, however, "that a causal relationship has not been established and that" the FDA "is not recommending discontinuation of the drug, which is indicated for prevention of organ rejection in kidney transplant recipients older than 12."

The label for the drug "already carries a boxed warning of excess mortality and graft loss associated with the use of" sirolimus "in combination with tacrolimus (Prograf) in de novo liver and lung transplant recipients."  And it also warns that it is not clear that the drug is safe for liver or lung transplant patients.  Doctors, therefore, should heed those warnings, comments the FDA.  Prescribing medication in a way that is contrary to the labeling may lead to serious permanent injury or death.

Our firm has experience pursing cases for patients that involve tragic medication errors,  pharmacy mix ups and unsafe medications.  If you think you have been injured by a defective product, we encourage you to read a portion of a book regarding products liability authored by senior partner Salvatore Zambri.

For information about your legal rights, please click here or contact us at Regan Zambri & Long, PLLC at 202-463-3030. 

Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, Esquire and Catherine Bertram, Esquire

Medical News Today recently reported that a certain kind of cholesterol--known as lipoprotein (a)--may increase the risk of heart attack (medically referred to as myocardial infarction, or MI).  This type of cholesterol, says the article, has been screened little.  Historically, doctors ahve been screening patients for low-denisty lipoproteins, commonly called "bad protein".  Nevertheless, MI has continued to be a leading cause of death.  As a result, scientists have been looking at other caused of heart disease.

The theory about lipoprotein (a) leading to heart disease stems from a study of people living in Denmark, who had higher levels of lipoprotein (a) due to genetic reasons, and who were at a higher risk of heart attack.  The article comments that the "researchers suggested that although their findings were strong enough to support the idea that higher levels of lipoprotein (a) due to genetic reasons very probably cause higher risk of heart attack, only randomized clinical trials that show fewer heart attacks occur when lipoprotein (a) is reduced through therapy can prove it."  So, expect more studies.

According to the report, representatives of "the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute's Framingham Heart Study commented that although Kamstrup and colleagues revealed some 'interesting mechanistic insights' into the biological link between lipoprotein (a) and MI, and put forward evidence that there might be potential benefit in reducing lipoprotein (a) early in life, the 'clinical implications are quite limited.'"

Before taking any medication, we encourage you to seek the advice of competent physicians. 

Our firm has experience pursing cases for patients that involvee tragic medication errors,  pharmacy mix ups and unsafe medications.  If you think you have been injured by a defective product, we encourage you to read a portion of a book regarding products liability authored by senior partner Salvatore Zambri.

For information about your legal rights, please click here or contact us at Regan Zambri & Long, PLLC at 202-463-3030.

Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, Esquire and Catherine Bertram, Esquire

The AP recently reported that  "The Food and Drug Administration warned consumers Monday not to use skin products made by Clarcon." This warning followed a recent inspection which revealed high levels of disease-causing bacteria in the products.  According to the report, the FDA has said that the findings are "particularly concerning because the products are promoted as antimicrobial agents that claim to treat open wounds and damaged skin and protect against various infectious diseases."  Yet, according to the report, some of the bacteria found in the products "can cause opportunistic infections of the skin and underlying tissues and could result in medical or surgical attention as well as permanent damage," the report comments.

Our firm has experience pursing cases for patients that involve tragic medication errors,  pharmacy mix ups and unsafe medications.  If you think you have been injured by a defective product, we encourage you to read a portion of a book regarding products liability authored by senior partner Salvatore Zambri.

For information about your legal rights, please click here or contact us at Regan Zambri & Long, PLLC at 202-463-3030.

Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, Esquire and Catherine Bertram, Esquire

Bloomberg News reports that "Merck & Co. and Schering-Plough Corp. were sued by a Pennsylvania fund for active and retired state employees over claims they misled consumers into paying too much for prescriptions of Zetia [ezetimibe] and Vytorin cholesterol pills."  The Pennsylvania Employees Benefit Trust Fund alleges in a complaint that "the companies have known for years -- and failed to make public -- that Zetia doesn't reduce fatty arterial plaques that can cause heart attacks and strokes."  The reports commenst that two studies last year showed that "the pills may work no better at unclogging arteries than does an older, cheaper medicine called simvastatin." Nevertheless, the companies allegedly withheld the the finding and "used false and deceptive marketing techniques claiming Vytorin was more efficacious than and just as safe as the much cheaper generic," according to the report.

Our firm has experience pursing cases for patients that involve tragic medication errors,  pharmacy mix ups and unsafe medications.  If you think you have been injured by a defective product, we encourage you to read a portion of a book regarding products liability authored by senior partner Salvatore Zambri.

For information about your legal rights, please click here or contact us at Regan Zambri & Long, PLLC at 202-463-3030.

Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, Esquire and Catherine Bertram, Esquire

Natalie Fullerton's father feels like he is responsible for the death of his child, but he's not.  After a successful lung transplant, Natalie was thriving.  Her loving father tirelessly cared for her post-surgery, administering medication with the use of syringes.  The syringes, however, were manufactured at a factory owned by a Lake Zurich businessman.  And they were contaminated.  Natalie died.  She was 2 1/2 years old.

The tainted syringes from the plant are now "linked to four deaths and 162 illnesses nationwide, including 22 in Illinois", according to ChicagoTribune.com.  The report comments that "an examination of inspection reports and other documents shows that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration missed several chances to stop the tainted syringes from being used by patients."

According to the article, just three months before the contaminated syringes were shipped (in October 2007), "an FDA inspector visited the plant in North Carolina where they were made. She investigated reports of red, brown and black particles in syringes and reported that managers had a plan to deal with rust."  Those plans were either faulty or non-existent, and teh FDA did not follow-up sufficiently it is suggested.

"A week later, when the FDA learned a distributor was recalling 1.3 million of the syringes, the agency should have launched a thorough inspection, according to its operations manual. That didn't happen, an FDA spokeswoman now says, because the agency is so understaffed it no longer follows the policy unless the recalled product poses a reasonable probability of serious injuries or deaths."

The bacteria on the syringes never should have entered the marketplace.  And, unfortunately, there is plenty of blame to go around.  The owner of the plant is now a fugitive of law.  He fled the country and is trying to evade charges that could land him 95 years on prison.

When dispensing medical devices, medical providers must be sure they are sterilized.  Manufacturers and distributors must do the same.  Natalie may not be the last victim of corporate greed and carelessness, but the FDA must do more to protect Americans of all ages.  That's what we pay them to do.

Our firm has experience pursing cases for patients that involve tragic medication or other medical errors.   If you think your providers have ignored your symptoms, we encourage you to read an article regarding medical malpractice authored by senior partner Salvatore Zambri.

For information about your legal rights, please click here or contact us at Regan Zambri & Long, PLLC at 202-463-3030.

Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, Esquire and Catherine Bertram, Esquire

The American Heart Association/American Stroke Association has established a new guideline, based on European studies,  concerning when a clot-busting drug known as tPA can be given intravenously to stroke victims. Previously, the guideline in America was to provide the drug only within three hours of the onset of symptoms,; otherwise, it could do more harm than good.  This posed a problem to patients who, for one reason or another, could not get to a hospital quickly enough following the start of stroke symptoms.  The new guideline extends the time in which the drug can be administered to four and one-half hours after symptoms begin.

It is important, however, to recognize that the widening of the window does not mean that doctors should act slowly when treating patients with stroke symptoms. The faster the clot in the brain is relieved, thereby restoring normal blood flow, the greater the likelihood of recovery.

The following is the American Stroke Association's list of "warning signs of stroke:

• Sudden numbness or weakness of the face, arm or leg, especially on one side of the body
• Sudden confusion, trouble speaking or understanding
• Sudden trouble seeing in one or both eyes
• Sudden trouble walking, dizziness, loss of balance or coordination
• Sudden, severe headache with no known cause"

If experiencing any of the warning signs of stroke, seek immediate medical attention, as time is of the essence.

Our firm has experience pursing cases for patients that involve tragic medication or other medical errors.   If you think your providers have ignored your symptoms, we encourage you to read an article regarding medical malpractice authored by senior partner Salvatore Zambri.

For information about your legal rights, please click here or contact us at Regan Zambri & Long, PLLC at 202-463-3030.

Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, Esquire and Catherine Bertram, Esquire

According to the The Wall Street Journal, staff from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) indicate that three medications "currently approved to treat bipolar disorder and schizophrenia in adults were effective at treating the disorders in children and adolescents, but carry significant risks." As a result, the FDA is now "considering applications for AstraZeneca PLC's Seroquel [quetiapine] and Eli Lilly and Co.'s Zyprexa [olanzapine] to treat bipolar disorder and schizophrenia in children and adolescents, and Pfizer, Inc.'s Geodon [ziprasidone] to treat bipolar disorder in children 10 to 17," comments the report.  In fact, "an FDA panel of outside medical experts is scheduled to meet to discuss" these atypical antipsychotic medications, and will be "asked to vote on whether each product is safe and effective for children ages 10 to 17."  The report goes on the add that the FDA and the drug-makers announced that "studies showed the products were effective at treating the symptoms of bipolar and schizophrenia," but also warned that "all had side effects."  These sides effects include "sedation and weight gain."

We encourage our readers to speak with their doctors before taking any medication.  Mixing drugs can be particularly dangerous.  Some drugs pose greater health risks than others.  Relying, too, on what the FDA reports and what the drug-makers themselves state about their own medications may not be sufficient.

Our firm has experience pursing cases for patients that involve tragic medication errors,  pharmacy mix ups and unsafe medications.  If you think you have been injured by a defective product, we encourage you to read a portion of a book regarding products liability authored by senior partner Salvatore Zambri.

For information about your legal rights, please click here or contact us at Regan Zambri & Long, PLLC at 202-463-3030.

Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, Esquire and Catherine Bertram, Esquire

An U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) report confirms that, two days ago, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) "warned health care professionals about the risk of serious liver injury associated with the use of the anti-thyroid drug propylthiouracil for the treatment of Graves' disease."  Citing the FDA, HHS reports that: "After analyzing adverse event reports, the FDA has identified an increased risk of liver injury with propylthiouracil when compared to an alternative treatment for Graves' disease, methimazole," said Amy Egan, M.D., deputy director for safety, Division of Metabolism and Endocrinology Products, in the FDA’s Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. "Health care professionals should carefully consider which drug to initiate in a patient recently diagnosed with Graves' disease. If propylthiouracil therapy is chosen, the patient should be closely monitored for symptoms and signs of liver injury, especially during the first six months after initiating therapy."

Graves' disease is an autoimmune disorder which causes the thyroid gland to be overactive. The thyroid gland releases hormones that regulate the rate of the body’s metabolism.  These hormones "are critical for body temperature control, energy, weight, mood, and blood calcium levels."

Medications can have serious side-effects, especially if warnings and precautions are not taken seriously. Doctors should fully inform patients of all risks associated with prescribed medications and patients should never hesitate to ask their doctors for more information if they are confused about the risks of certian medications.

Our firm has experience pursing cases for patients that involve tragic medication errors,  pharmacy mix ups and unsafe medications.  If you think you have been injured by a defective product, we encourage you to read a portion of a book regarding products liability authored by senior partner Salvatore Zambri.

For information about your legal rights, please click here or contact us at Regan Zambri & Long, PLLC at 202-463-3030.

Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, Esquire and Catherine Bertram, Esquire

We recently posted a blog informing our readers that a Bloomberg report announced that  researches have determined that certain antidepressants may increase the recurrence  of breast cancer among women who have already survived the disease.  The study reports that drugs including Prozac, Paxil and Zoloft "significantly decrease the effectiveness of a drug [tamoxifen] used to reduce the chances of breast cancer recurrence". 

A new Bloomberg report of yesterday confirms that "US regulators may warn patients taking tamoxifen, a breast cancer medicine...not to use certain types of antidepressants because they block the tumor-fighting drug's effectiveness." Karen Riley, a spokeswoman for the Food and Drug Administration, commented that the agency is considering "'adding new information to the tamoxifen label to advise women taking the cancer drug against using some antidepressants."

Ms. Riley's comments are welcomed, but action is what is needed.  The public must be warned of the harmful effects of mixing these drugs.  It could be a matter of life and death.

Our firm has experience pursing cases for patients that involve tragic medication errors,  pharmacy mix ups and unsafe medications.  If you think you have been injured by a defective product, we encourage you to read a portion of a book regarding products liability authored by senior partner Salvatore Zambri.

For information about your legal rights, please click here or contact us at Regan Zambri & Long, PLLC at 202-463-3030.

Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, Esquire and Catherine Bertram, Esquire

According to a recent Bloomberg report, researches have determined that certain antidepressants may increase the recurrence  of breast cancer among women who have already survived the disease.  The study reports that drugs including Prozac, Paxil and Zoloft "significantly decrease the effectiveness of a drug [tamoxifen] used to reduce the chances of breast cancer recurrence", states the article. 

Notably, the study revealed that tumors were more than twice as likely to return after two years in women taking the antidepressants cited above while on the anti-cancer drug tamoxifen, as compared with those taking tamoxifen alone. The research was conducted by Medco Health Solutions Inc., and was presented at a meeting of researchers at the American Society of Clinical Oncology in Orlando.

To read the entire article, please click here.

Our firm has experience pursing cases for patients that involve tragic medication errors,  pharmacy mix ups and unsafe medications.  If you think you have been injured by a defective product, we encourage you to read a portion of a book regarding products liability authored by senior partner Salvatore Zambri.

For information about your legal rights, please click here or contact us at Regan Zambri & Long, PLLC at 202-463-3030.

Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, Esquire and Catherine Bertram, Esquire

The Washington Post reports that Congress plans to question officials with the Department of Veteran Affairs concerning events that have potentially exposed more than 10,000 former VA patients to blood borne illnesses, including HIV.  The purpose of the U.S. House Committee on Veterans' Affairs' investigation is to determine whether the exposure came from improper medical procedures and, if so, what the VA has done to address the problems.  

Our firm has experience pursing cases for patients that involve tragic medical errors.  If you think you have been injured as a result of medical negligence, we encourage you to read an article regarding medical malpractices cases authored by senior partner Salvatore Zambri.

For information about your legal rights, please click here or contact us at Regan Zambri & Long, PLLC at 202-463-3030.

By Victor E. Long, Esq. 

The Maryland Court of Appeals upheld the dismissal of  a case which sought to  draw a link between the  Thimerosal and Autism.   The high court affirmed a ruling, the first in the nation, subjecting the thimerosal/autism link to a  difficult evidentiary test.  The defendant's moved to disqualify five potential experts on the grounds that the experts were not qualified in epidemiology, the study of the distribution of diseases in populations.  The motion led to a ten day evidentiary hearing.  The CDC has concluded that the evidence favors rejection of a causal relationship.  Many vaccines contain thimerosal.

Blackwell et al v. Wyeth ,CA No. 112 Sept. Term 2008 Filed May 7, 2008.

Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, Esquire and Catherine Bertram, Esquire

The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reports that an "investigation by Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington found 'a number of serious questions' about a study by a former surgeon at the hospital evaluating the use of a bone-growth protein in soldiers with leg fractures."  The product at the center of the study, Infuse, is a bone-growth drug that is widely used in hospitals and by physicians to treat broken bones. The report goes on to state that the former Walter Reed surgeon "forged his purported co-authors' signatures on the study and that the number of injured soldiers differs from the Army's records of its wartime casualties. Hospital officials said the study was based on 'falsified information.'"

WSJ was not the only periodical to challenge the study by Timothy R. Kuklo. The St. Louis Post Dispatch reported that  the surgeon "published a study that reported a bone growth drug sold by Medtronic Inc. had a higher success rate than Walter Reed doctors could verify."  Medtronic has confirmed that he "was a paid consultant, but that Medtronic did not review or finance the study."

If the study was indeed falsified, it woul dbe another example of putting profits over people.  Patients rely on drug and device manufacturers conducting ethical and reliable studies.  Pushing drugs and devices into teh marketplace and disseminating promotional materials that are false or misleading can cause serious and potentially deadly consequences.  

Our firm has experience pursing cases for patients that involve tragic medication errors,  pharmacy mix ups and unsafe medications.  If you think you have been injured by a defective product, we encourage you to read a portion of a book regarding products liability authored by senior partner Salvatore Zambri.

For information about your legal rights, please click here or contact us at Regan Zambri & Long, PLLC at 202-463-3030.

Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, Esquire and Catherine Bertram, Esquire

Dow Jones Newswires  reports that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has urged Sanofi-Aventis SA, a drug manufacturer, "to stop distributing certain promotional material for its breast cancer drug, Taxotere [docetaxel], saying the material misleadingly claims the medicine is more effective than proven."  According to the report, the FDA has indicated that "binders with reprinted medical studies claim Sanofi's Taxotere is better than other medicines to treat patients with breast cancer after prior chemotherapy treatments failed," yet the "FDA is unaware of substantial evidence to support these claims."

We encourage our readers to be very careful when reading or listening to promotional materials disseminated by drug companies.  All too often these materials are misleading and are driven by the drug companies' desire to maximize its profits.   We believe that people should be above profits and that promotional materials must be accurate and properly informative.  If profits are put above people, public health will be compromised.

Our firm has experience pursing cases for patients that involve tragic medication errors,  pharmacy mix ups and unsafe medications.  If you think you have been injured by a defective product, we encourage you to read a portion of a book regarding products liability authored by senior partner Salvatore Zambri.

For information about your legal rights, please click here or contact us at Regan Zambri & Long, PLLC at 202-463-3030.

Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, Esquire and Catherine Bertram, Esquire

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA), along with manufacturers OSI and Genentech, notified healthcare professionals of new safety information that has been added to the " WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS" sections of the prescribing information for Tarceva.  The FDA reports that "[g]astrointestinal perforation (including fatalities), bullous, blistering and exfoliative skin conditions including cases suggestive of Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis, in some cases fatal, and ocular disorders, including corneal perforation or ulceration have been reported during use of Tarceva." (emphasis added).  Tarceva has been used to treat patients with certain kinds of lung cancer after at least one prior chemotherapy regimen proved to be unsuccessful.  It has also been prescribed to treat patients with pancreatic cancer.

To read the entire FDA report, please click here.

Medications can have serious side-effects, especially if warnings and precautions are not taken seriously. Doctors should fully inform patients of all risks associated with prescribed medications and patients should never hesitate to ask their doctors for more information if they are confused about the risks of certian medications.

Our firm has experience pursing cases for patients that involve tragic medication errors,  pharmacy mix ups and unsafe medications.  If you think you have been injured by a defective product, we encourage you to read a portion of a book regarding products liability authored by senior partner Salvatore Zambri.

For information about your legal rights, please click here or contact us at Regan Zambri & Long, PLLC at 202-463-3030.

Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, Esquire and Catherine Bertram, Esquire

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reports that Biosite and the FDA have notified medical professionals of a Class 1 recall of the Biosite-brand Triage Cardiac Panel.  This particular panel is a test used by healthcare specialists to diagnose a heart attack (myocardial infarction).  However, according to the FDA, the "use of the affected lot may lead to false negative results with patient samples containing troponin I at very low levels, with CK-MB, and with myoglobin, possibly resulting in missed or incorrect diagnosis. A false negative test result would indicate that a person has not had a heart attack or heart muscle injury when in fact they have."

All Biosite customers must stop using all Biosite-brand Triage Cardiac Panels immediately.  Reliance upon these defective tests can lead to mistreatment of people with otherwise treatable heart conditions.

To read the entire recall, please click here.

Our firm has experience pursing cases for patients that involve tragic medication errors,  pharmacy mix ups and unsafe medications.  If you think you have been injured by a defective product, we encourage you to read a portion of a book regarding products liability authored by senior partner Salvatore Zambri.

For information about your legal rights, please click here or contact us at Regan Zambri & Long, PLLC at 202-463-3030.

Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, Esquire and Catherine Bertram, Esquire

Former patients at several Veterans Administration Hospitals have been tested positive for HIV or hepatitis following exposure to dirty medical equipment.  According to a recent report at Chron.com, "[f]ive patients have tested positive for HIV and 33 have tested positive for hepatitis since February, when the VA started notifying more than 11,000 people treated at three VA medical centers to get follow-up blood checks because they could have been exposed to infectious body fluids." The specific VA hospitals involved are located in Miami, Fla., Murfreesboro, Tenn., and Augusta, Ga.

The VA determined last December that its equipment used for colonoscopies and ear, nose and throat procedures "was either not properly cleaned or set up", states the report.  Despite the medical errors, Dr. Jim Bagian, the VA's chief patient safety officer, boldly proclaimed that patients will never be able to prove that they were infected by the tainted equipment, the report comments. Congress is not satisfied with this statement and wants more information.

Senior partner Salvatore Zambri has handled many cases involving patients becoming infected with HIV as a result of medical errors.  There are clear standards that apply to hospitals governing the sterilization of medical devices and products.  If these procedures are not followed, the consequences can be severe.

If you think you have been injured by a defective or unclean device, we encourage you to read a portion of a book regarding products liability authored by senior partner Salvatore Zambri.

For information about your legal rights, please click here or contact us at Regan Zambri & Long, PLLC at 202-463-3030.

Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, Esquire and Catherine Bertram, Esquire

The Subcommittee on Health will hold a hearing tomorrow regarding The Medical Device Safety Act of 2009.   This is an important piece of legislation that should become law.  We encourage our readers to contact their representatives in Congress and urge them to vote in favor of the bill.

The Medical Device Safety Act of 2009 is important for two principal reasons.  First, it will allow every American patient to hold manufacturers of defective medical devices accountable for injuries and deaths caused by unsafe products.  It will also prevent the manufacturers of defective devices from receiving total immunity from any claims simply because the devices were previously approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 

On March 19, 2009, the editors of the New England Journal of Medicine endorsed the Medical Device Safety Act. They stated:

"Patients and physicians deserve to be fully informed about the benefits and risks of medical devices, and the companies making the devices should be held accountable if they fail to achieve this standard. We urge Congress to swiftly pass this legislation and to allow lawsuits by injured patients, which have been an important part of the regulatory framework and very effective in keeping medical devices safe, to proceed in the courts."

The New York Times has also endorsed the bill.

Medical devices can be extremely dangerous, and the FDA often does a poor job screening defective products from the public.  If your doctor wants to insert a medical device into your body, ask questions to be sure your physician has sufficiently investigated the device's safety and effectiveness.

If you think you have been injured by a defective device, we encourage you to read a portion of a book regarding products liability authored by senior partner Salvatore Zambri.

For information about your legal rights, please click here or contact us at Regan Zambri & Long, PLLC at 202-463-3030.

Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, Esquire and Catherine Bertram, Esquire

An editorial from yesterday's New York Times challenges the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) , suggesting that the agency has been too lenient in approving medical devices.  The article notes that a “vaginal sling,” used to control urinary leaks, that was previously sold by the Mentor Corporation,  a company that was acquired by Johnson & Johnson, has caused serious medical problems for many women throughout the country. In one instance, a woman's "surgeon inserted a strip of synthetic mesh — Mentor’s ObTape vaginal sling — under her urethra. It stopped the leakage but soon caused pain and bleeding as pieces of the sling worked their way through her vaginal wall. The woman has had five operations to remove bits of the sling, and another is scheduled."

Last year, the FDA received more than 1,000 reports directly from manufacturers about complications with "vaginal-sling"-like devices, according to the report.  About one-fourth of the complaints concerned "ObTape" specifically.  "The injuries may stem from the fact that far too many medical devices are cleared for sale without undergoing rigorous clinical trials for safety and efficacy."

To read the entire article, please click here.

Medical devices can be extremely dangerous, and the FDA often does a poor job screenign defective products from the public.  If your doctor wants to insert a medical device into your body, ask questions to be sure your physician has sufficiently investigated the device's safety and effectiveness.

If you think you have been injured by a defective device, we encourage you to read a portion of a book regarding products liability authored by senior partner Salvatore Zambri.

For information about your legal rights, please click here or contact us at Regan Zambri & Long, PLLC at 202-463-3030.

Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, Esquire and Catherine Bertram, Esquire

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has found that more than 70 weight-loss products contain prescription drugs, including four illegal drugs that have not approved by the FDA for sale in the United States, according to Public Citizen, citing its Worst Pills, Best Pills News article released last week on WorstPills.org, the organization’s drug safety website.

The FDA has announced what is obvious--that adding active prescription drug ingredients to otherwise ineffective weight-loss supplements is not only illegal, but can be extremely dangerous.  "For instance, sibutramine (brand name Meridia, an appetite suppressant available by prescription only and a controlled substance) and fluoxetine (brand names Prozac and Serafem, an antidepressant available by prescription only) were among the drugs found in the supplements", states Public Citizen. 

Although the FDA is seeking a voluntary recall of the illegal products, some say the FDA is not acting strong enough.  "The FDA’s response has been inadequate,” said Sidney M. Wolfe, M.D., director of Public Citizen’s Health Research Group and acting Public Citizen president. “Some of the drugs found in these supplements are dangerous and are putting people at an unacceptable risk of injury. To protect citizens, the agency needs to go further and seize these products.”

To read the entire article, please click here.

We encourage our readers to be very careful about what medications they ingest.  All medications should be supervised by a physician.  Don't become a victim of others' greed.

For information about your legal rights, please click here or contact us at Regan Zambri & Long, PLLC at 202-463-3030.

Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, Esquire and Catherine Bertram, Esquire

Both the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) have warned the public to be wary of entities selling products through the internet "that claim to diagnose, prevent, mitigate, treat or cure the 2009 H1N1 influenza virus"--the swine flu.  According to the FDA, many of the products are fraudulently advertised, and officials are going after the perpetrators, who face serious consequences if found guilty of fraud.

“The last thing any consumer needs right now is to be conned by someone selling fraudulent flu remedies,” said FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz.  “The FTC will act swiftly against companies that resort to deceptive advertising.”

To read the FDA press release, please click here.

We encourage our readers to be very careful about what medications they ingest.  All medications should be supervised by a physician.  Don't become a victim of others' greed.

For information about your legal rights, please click here or contact us at Regan Zambri & Long, PLLC at 202-463-3030.

Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, Esquire and Catherine Bertram, Esquire

For nearly thirty years, in-vitro fertilization (IVF) has been consider relatively safe.  A recent report in the New York Times, however, reports that new epidemiological studies and scientific techniques have revealed findings that suggest that "there may be some abnormal patterns of gene expression associated with IVF and a possible increase in rare but devastating genetic disorders that appear to be directly linked to those unusual gene expression patterns."  The report also states that, with IVF, there "appears to be an increased risk of premature birth and of babies with low birth weight for their gestational age."

To read the entire article, please click here.

If you are considering an IVF procedure, we encourage you to speak with your doctors about all potential risks and benefits, so that you can make fully informed decisions.

For information about your legal rights, please click here or contact us at Regan Zambri & Long, PLLC at 202-463-3030.

Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, Esquire and Catherine Bertram, Esquire

The economy is forcing twenty percent (20%) of Americans to delay or avoid needed medical care, according to a recent Thomson Reuters survey. The survey also reports that more than 20% of Americans believe they will have difficulty paying for health insurance or health services over the next three months.

"We are seeing a positive correlation between Americans losing their access to employer-sponsored health insurance and deferral of healthcare," said Gary Pickens, of Reuters' health-care division, who led the study.  "if this trend continues, it will ultimately have an impact on our collective well-being."

If you are having difficulty affording health coverage, we urge you to contact local and state agencies to see if you qualify for Medicaid or other benefits.  Certain private companies, like Walgreens, provide programs for the unemployed and uninsured, as well.

For information about your legal rights, please click here or contact us at Regan Zambri & Long, PLLC at 202-463-3030.

Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, Esquire and Catherine Bertram, Esquire

According to MercuryNews.com, technologists monitoring the threat have determined that hundreds of medical devices used at hospitals throughout the country are infected by the computer worm known as "Conficker".  The infected devices include MRI machines and hundreds, if not thousands, of other medical devices.  Manufacturer of the devices told investigators that "none of the machines were supposed to be connected to the Internet — and yet they were. And because the machines were running an unpatched version of Microsoft's operating system used in embedded devices they were vulnerable," states the report.

The report explains that "Conficker spreads by copying itself onto machines running Microsoft's Windows operating system that lack the security patch from October. Conficker installs itself and periodically reaches out for directions from its maker that cause it to rewrite its code, increasing its capabilities for malicious action and decreasing its chance of detection."  Apparently, patients have not yet been harmed, but it is clear that these infected devices place patients at risk.

To read the entire article, please click here.

Many Americans are injured or killed each year due to defective products.  For information about your legal rights, please click here or contact us at Regan Zambri & Long, PLLC at 202-463-3030. 

Posted by Patrick Regan and Paul Cornoni

Bloomberg News (4/30 Fisk, Feeley) reports, "Just two months after the U.S. Supreme Court decided patients can sue drugmakers over injuries from medicines approved by the government, long-stalled lawsuits against GlaxoSmithKline Plc and Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. are again moving toward trials."

The Supreme Court's decision in Wyeth essentially states that federal regulatory approval (FDA) of a medicine or drug doesn't shield drugmakers from claims that patients were not adequately warned of potential side effects and other harms.  The Wyeth decision has already affected more than 250 lawsuits involving at least ten different drug companies. 

As the article explains: "Glaxo this month settled two cases on claims its antidepressant Paxil can make patients suicidal, after judges set trials citing the Wyeth decision. A Barr Pharmaceuticals hyperactivity-drug case is to be tried in August in federal court in Tallahassee, Florida. And a group of Bristol-Myers lawsuits over the blood-thinner Plavix may now proceed to trial in federal court in Trenton, New Jersey."

Posted by Patrick M. Regan

Parents shopping for baby cribs are going to notice some significant changes in the types of cribs offered for sale.  Toys "R" Us has recently announced that it will stop selling drop down cribs because of a concern for the safety of infants.  In a blog on the Wall Street Journal's (4/22) website, Rachel Silverman wrote, "Concerns about the safety of popular crib designs have led to 21 recalls of 4.2 million cribs over the past two years because of hazardous defects" and the "products involved in the recalls have been linked to at least five infant deaths and 16 cases in which babies were trapped by parts of a crib, said the Consumer Product Safety Commission."

Posted by:  Salvatore J. Zambri and Catherine Bertram

Not even the inventors of Botox could have anticipated how widely used the drug has become.  Once thought to be the answer to wrinkles, Botox is now being administered to treat all kinds of  ailments, including,  migraines, speech impediments, skin disorders, muscle and gland problems, and much more, according to a recent publication in the New York Times. 

The Times report quotes Dr. Mitchell F. Brin, a neurologist who is the chief scientific officer for Botox at Allergan, the drug’s maker, who stated, “We see it as a molecule that keeps on giving.  As we understand it more, it gives us new ideas of how to use it." But not everyone agrees.  “It’s trial and error with a nerve poison,” says Dr. Sidney M. Wolfe, the director of the health research group at Public Citizen, a consumer advocacy group. 

To read the entire Times article, please click here.

Botox is a nerve poison produced by the bacteria that cause botulism, a disease that paralyzes muscles and can be fatal. Before taking any medication, please be sure you are evaluated by your physician.  The wrongful administration of medication can cause serious permanent injury or death. 

For information about defective medications and your rights, please click here or contact us at Regan Zambri & Long, PLLC at 202-463-3030.

Posted by: Salvatore J. Zambri, Esquire and Catherine Bertram, Esquire

According to the New York Times, a new study found that pregnant women who took a popular epilepsy drug-- valproate, sold generically and under the brand name Depakote-- to treat migraines, pain and psychiatric disorders had children whose I.Q. scores were significantly lower than similar children who were not exposed to the drug.  Valporate remains the second-most-popular antiseizure medication used for epilepsy, says the report, but users must fully appreciate  its risks.

“My thought is that if I make a mistake and the patient has a breakthrough seizure, I can change the medication and switch the patient to valproate,” said Dr. Kimford J. Meador, professor of neurology at Emory University School of Medicine in Atlanta, and the first author of the new study. “If I put the patient on valproate as a first choice and the baby has cognitive impairment or a malformation, I can’t repair that.”

To read the full Times report, please click here.

Before taking any medication, please be sure you are evaluated by your physician.  The consequences of mixing medications and taking them while pregnant can be devastating. 

For information about defective medications and your rights, please click here or contact us at Regan Zambri & Long, PLLC at 202-463-3030.

The American Association for Justice is following a developing story involving FDA approval of uses of the anti-psychotic drug Seroquel.  The FDA has approved the drug for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, but AstraZeneca has been marketing the drug to patients suffering from depression and anxiety.  AstraZeneca is currently under review by the FDA to have the drug’s use expanded to include patients of depression and anxiety.  However, many believe that sealed documents with the court could shed some light on the side effects of Seroquel.   

Ted Baker, 60, of Bastrop, La., a Vietnam veteran who suffers from post-traumatic stress disorder and major depressive disorder, was prescribed Seroquel in 2001 as an antidepressant and continued to take it until 2006.  Due to his Seroquel use, he was diagnosed with Type II diabetes in March 2004.

Many people fear that the expanded use of this drug could expose others to diabetes.   Please review AAJ's press release for more details concerning this story. 

In the New York Times advertising column, Stephanie Clifford writes that "the Food and Drug Administration sent letters to 14 major pharmaceutical companies late last month, "warning them that their "search advertisements...had to start including risk information about each drug or else be rewritten or removed."

The companies, however, argued that "there was no way to include all the required information" within the "95 characters...allowed for search ads." According to Arnie Friede, counsel at McDermott, Will & Emery, "Until these letters were sent, pharmaceutical and media companies had assumed that there was a one-click rule" under which they would be "in compliance" if they "provided risk information within one click of their search ads." In changing the ads, industry executives now claim they "are even more confusing and misleading" and that "the agency is ignoring the realities of Internet marketing." Furthermore, the drug industry argues that the FDA "is not issuing clear rules about compliance."

The FDA has issued a Class 1 Recall for electronic infusion pumps that deliver IV medications and fluids to patients.   Class 1 recalls, the most serious category, are made when there is a reasonable probability that use of the product will cause injury or death.  We have reproduced the FDA Warning Notice in its entirety for our readers. 

Class 1 Recall: Baxter Colleague Single and Triple Channel Volumetric Infusion Pumps

Date Recall Initiated: January 23, 2009
Product:  Baxter Colleague Single and Triple Channel Volumetric Infusion Pumps

Model numbers: Mono 2M8151 and 2M8153, CX 2M8161 and 2M8163, and CXE 2M9161and 2M9163

These products were manufactured and distributed from February, 1997 through December, 2008.

Use:  Electronic infusion pumps deliver controlled amounts of medications or other fluids to patients through an intravenous (IV), intra-arterial (IA), epidural, and other acceptable routes of administration.

Recalling Firm:
Baxter Healthcare Corp.
Rt. 120 & Wilson Rd.
Round Lake, Illinois 60073

Reason for Recall:

The company identified software and battery usage failures that result in a delay in or interruption of infusion that may cause serious injury and/or death.

Public Contact:
Customers may call Baxter Healthcare Corp. at 1-800-843-7867

FDA District:
Chicago

FDA Comment:

On January 23, 2009, the company sent a correction letter to all of its customers about failures that could lead to:

* interruption of therapy
* damaged battery messages
* smoke and fire hazards
* serious injury and/or death

The letter also:

* advised institutions to have contingency plans to verify that back-up pumps are available
* provided new steps for addressing an interruption of therapy with any failure code
* provided instructions for addressing damaged battery messages
* provided instructions for proper device cleaning

For more information about this recall, please see the company’s press release at: http://www.baxter.com/about_baxter/news_room/ news_releases/2009/03_11_09_colleague.html

Class 1 recalls are the most serious type of recall and involve situations in which there is a reasonable probability that use of the product will cause serious injury or death.

Health care professionals and consumers may report adverse reactions or quality problems experienced with the use of this product to the FDA's MedWatch Adverse Event Reporting program either online, by regular mail or by FAX.

* Online: www.fda.gov/MedWatch/report.htm
* Regular Mail: use postage-paid FDA form 3500 available at: www.fda.gov/MedWatch/getforms.htm
Mail to MedWatch 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20852-9787
* FAX: 1-800-FDA-0178

Updated March 11, 2009

The Supreme Court of the United States recently announced its ruling in the Wyeth v. Levine case. The principal question before the Court was whether FDA approval of a drug's label overrides (or preempts) state-law claims of inadequate warning. The argument made by the drug company was that it would be impossible to comply with both state and federal laws if the state's law provides for a stronger warning label than the FDA labeling regulation. The Supreme Court rightly rejected that argument, finding that "Congress did not intend FDA oversight to be the exclusive means of ensuring drug safety and effectiveness." By issuing this ruling, the Court will allow consumers more protection from drug injuries that could have been prevented if the drug label had included proper warnings.

In this case, Diane Levine, a professional musician being treated for migraine headaches was injected with Phenergan, a drug manufactured by Wyeth. Because of the direct IV administration (IV push) of the drug, Ms. Levine's artery in her arm died, ultimately resulting in amputation of that arm. Wyeth was aware of the dangers of the IV push method for administering Phenergan, but never included any warnings to prohibit IV push administration on the label. The FDA had not determined whether the label should have included the warning. However, the FDA's labeling rules require that a prescription drug manufacturer change warning labels as soon as there is reasonable evidence that the drug causes adverse reactions without waiting for FDA approval of the label change.

Government regulations are intended to set minimum safety standards, but cannot guarantee safety. The preamble of regulations was intended to define the agency's interpretation. Beginning in 2005, Federal agencies started adding to the preamble of regulations without Congressional approval. With these additions, the agencies claimed that federal standards overrule any state safety standards and that state tort claims should be discarded. By adding preemption language to the agency preamble, the agencies bypassed Congress in determining if or when state law should be overruled. In 2007, however, Congress passed the Food and Drug Administration Act of 2007 (FDAAA), forcing the FDA to require drug manufacturers to update their labels when the manufacturers become aware of potential hazards.

If you or a family member has been injured as a result of a drug error or other product defect, please contact us on-line at Regan Zambri & Long or call us at 202-463-3030 for a free consultation.

Whether the drug names are Celexa and Celebrex, Losec and Lasix, or even Prilosec and Prozac, sound-alike drug names pose dangers to patients.  Those dangers are compounded by the multi-ethnic and geographic diversity of the U.S. healthcare system, where strong accents combined with ordinary mispronunciation of complex pharmaceutical terms can lead to catastrophic outcomes if the wrong medication is accidentally dispensed.  Medication errors and sound-alike drug names are the topics of a recent article featured on HealthDay News.

The latest Trasylol study was released Wednesday is slated to appear in print in the May 29 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine.

New hemoglobin-based artificial blood -- still unapproved for use in the U.S., but heavily studied -- appears to raise a patient's risk of heart attack and death according to an exhaustive review of clinical research data.  This latest research was published in a recent edition of the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).  The findings have spurred critics to allege that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) put clinical trial participants in imminent danger by failing to detect or act on research data illustrating significant increases in the rates of heart attack and death reported in trials of these blood substitutes.

Though patients and even dentists are often unaware, crowns, bridges and other dental devices produced by foreign manufacturers contain dangerous levels of lead in many instances, according to an investigative report by WBNS-10 TV  -- an Ohio television station that has captured the attention of the American Dental Association (ADA) and millions of concerned patients.

According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Baxter Healthcare Corp. has announced that it is recalling all remaining multi-dose vials of their heparin, as well as single-dose vials and Hep-Lock heparin flush products, which prevent blood clots in intravenous (IV) lines.  Baxter widened its initial recall after another manufacturer of multi-dose heparin vials -- APP Pharmaceuticals of Schaumburg, Ill. -- was able to assure the FDA that it could meet the demand for the entire supply of the blood thinner in the United States.  Several U.S. manufacturers produce items similar to Baxter's Hep-Lock.

Breast cancer patients who elect reconstruction surgery immediately following a mastectomy suffer substantially higher rates of surgical infection when they choose to use surgical implants, rather than their own abdominal fat, to shape their breasts.  The finding is the result of new research published in the journal Archives of Surgery. 

Levels of lead in childrens' blood which were previously thought to be safe could actually be contributing to Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), according to researchers at Michigan State University.  Their research findings will appear in the March issue of Biological Psychiatry, the official journal of the Society of Biological Psychiatry. 

Cardiologists are growing increasingly suspicious over the hesitation of drug makers to release the results of clinical trials for the cholesterol-lowering drugs Vytorin and Zetia, according to a recent New York Times article.  The two drugs are prescribed for an estimated 800,000 Americans every week, generating sales of $4 billion in 2007 alone.  Clinical trials of the drugs ended two years ago, but manufacturers Merck and Schering-Plough have yet to release those research results.

Bayer Schering Pharma, the manufacturer of popular heart surgery drug Trasylol, will suspend all marketing of the drug until a review can be conducted of recent Canadian research which has implicated the drug in a higher risk of death for cardiac patients. 

Mattel, Inc. has announced an expanded recall of 9 million toys due to health threats posed by powerful magnets and toxic lead paint.  Approximately 1.5 million toys were recalled on August 1st, all of which had been manufactured in China.  These latest additions were also manufactured in China.  Among those magnetic toys most recently recalled are Polly Pocket toys, Barbie and Tanner sets, Doggie Daycare sets and Batman figurines.  Sarge characters from the movie Cars are being recalled due to toxic surface paint.

Red yeast rice and red yeast rice supplements are often marketed as cholesterol-lowering alternatives to medication.  The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has announced, however, that some red yeast rice products may lower peoples' cholesterol because manufacturers have been illegally lacing them with lovastatin -- the active ingredient in Mevacor, a prescription cholesterol drug.  The FDA has issued warnings related to the following specific red yeast rice products:

• Red Yeast Rice and Red Yeast Rice/Policosonal Complex, sold by Swanson Healthcare Products, Inc. and manufactured by Nature’s Value Inc. and Kabco Inc., respectively

• Cholestrix, sold by Sunburst Biorganics.

Fisher-Price and its parent company, Mattel, Inc., are recalling 83 kinds of children's toys, including Sesame Street, Sponge Bob and Dora the Explorer figures among others, because surface paint on the toys contains high levels of lead.  The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) has stated that the toys were available in most major retail stores between May 2007 and August 2007, for prices between $5 and $40.  The recall is the first ever for Fisher-Price or Mattel, Inc. involving lead paint, and the largest recall for Mattel, Inc. in nearly a decade.  No injuries have yet been attributed to the toys, which were manufactured in Chinese facilities.

Following an expanded recall of the Kugel hernia patch, The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has inspected the headquarters of its manufacturer, Davol, Inc., and issued the company a warning, citing serious quality control problems related to the manufacture of its surgical patch and an associated fixation device.  The inspection was completed in March, 2007. 

Discount store toothpaste labeled "Colgate" and sold in 5-ounce tubes is being recalled after it was found to contain diethylene glycol, an ingredient used to make anti-freeze, according to a bulletin issued by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).  The product was also found not to contain fluoride. 

The Colgate-Palmolive company denies responsibility for the contamination, noting that the affected toothpaste is counterfeit and that the boxes are marked "Manufactured in South Africa," and feature a number of misspelled words.  Colgate does not import its product from South Africa, and is working closely with the FDA to identify the source of the contaminated product. 

If you suspect you have purchased counterfeit Colgate toothpaste, you are urged to call the Colgate-Palmolive at (800) 468-6502.

If you or a family member believes that you have a case involving a dangerous product, please contact us on-line at Regan Zambri & Long or call us at 202-463-3030 for a free consultation.  If you would like to receive our complimentary electronic newsletter, please click here. 

Contact lens wearers should immediately stop using Complete MoisturePlus Multi Purpose Solution and discard all partially-used or unopened bottles.  Reports of a rare and extremely serious eye infection have been linked to the solution.  The infection, Acanthamoeba keratitis, is caused by a parasite and may lead to vision loss with some patients requiring a corneal transplant.  Normally healthy people who wear contact lenses may be affected by the parasite.  During a recent investigation by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), users of the Complete MoisturePlus Multi Purpose Solution were at least seven times more likely to develop Acanthamoeba keratitis than those who used another brand.

According to an announcement by the director of the Center for Devices and Radiological Health of U.S. Food and Drug Administration(FDA), the manufacturer of the product, Advanced Medical Optics,  "acted responsibly in taking this voluntary action and support their decision to be proactive in the interest of public health.  FDA and CDC are working closely with the company to collect additional information and we will continue to  alert consumers and advise them as more information becomes available."

Consumers should consult with their doctors about alternative cleansing/disinfecting products.  If they have any symptoms of eye infection, they should seek immediate medical attention.  Early detection is critical for effective treatment of Acanthamoeba keratitis.

In a Fall 2006 release, the FDA urged consumers not to buy drugs on line from Canadian pharmacies.  The FDA’s 2005 crackdown found that 85% of drugs intercepted from “Canadian pharmacies,”  actually came from 27 other countries.

In particular, the FDA is urging consumers not to purchase any medications from websites that have orders filled by Mediplan Prescription Plus Pharmacy or Mediplan Global Health in Manitoba, Canada. The FDA is currently investigating reports that these companies are involved in the distribution of counterfeit drugs to US consumers.

On November 17, 2006, after “rigorous” scientific review, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the marketing of silicone gel-filled breast implants made by two companies for breast reconstruction in women of all ages and breast augmentation in women ages 22 and older.  The products are manufactured by Allergan Corp., Irvine, California, and Mentor Corp., Santa Barbara, California.  The approval has been highly criticized by consumer groups, including Public Citizen, which labeled them the "most defective medical device ever approved by the FDA" as well as a “terrible reminder of the double standard for women versus men” since the FDA has not approved silicone gel testicular implants because of the inadequacy of clinical trials.

According to the Seattle Times, “the increasingly common practice of preventing strokes by using wire-mesh stents to prop open neck arteries is much riskier than the traditional method of surgically removing plaque and should be curtailed, according to two large European studies.”  The American studies, however, seem to suggest that stents are safer than surgery. 

The Idaho Department of Health and Welfare has confirmed that the toddler who died of kidney failure was infected by the same E. coli strand found in tainted spinach from the Salinas Valley, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s latest update on the E. coli outbreak.

It is remarkable how quickly pharmaceutical products can move through the regulatory approval process, so much so that one might question the effectiveness of research and development by manufacturers. Since the approval of mifepristone (marketed as Mifiprex) in September 2000, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has received reports of six deaths in the United States following medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol. Of the two most recent deaths reported to FDA in March 2006 (see DC Metro Area Medical Malpractice Law Blog, Deaths Following Administration of Medical Abortion), one has been determined to be unrelated to an abortion or to the use of these medications, while the other, with symptoms of infection, continues to be under investigation. According to previous FDA reports, four women in the United States have died from sepsis (severe illness caused by infection of the bloodstream) after medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol. All four women were infected by the same type of bacteria. While sepsis is a known risk of abortion in general, the symptoms in these four cases were not typical of sepsis. FDA has tested batches of mifepristone and misoprostol and has not found any contamination with the type of bacteria involved in the four cases. FDA recommends that women who have taken these medications for medical abortion contact a healthcare professional immediately if they develop stomach pain or discomfort, or have weakness, nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea with or without fever, more than 24 hours after taking the misoprostol For historical information regarding mifepristone and misoprostol, please see Historical Information on Mifepristone (marketed as Mifeprex).

All too often, we find that clients have not been provided with complete information and, as a result, have not been given the opportunity to make informed decisions with regard to their own care or the care of a loved one. According to Generation Rescue, a nonprofit organization formed by parents of children diagnosed with autism and other developmental disorders, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has minimized or attempted to conceal the association between childhood vaccines and autism. On April 6, 2006, Generation Rescue launched a website, www.PutChildrenFirst.org, and placed a full page advertisement in USA Today with regard to its allegations and the basis for them. Many parents and scientists believe that autism and other neurological disorders, including Attention Deficit Disorder/Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADD/ADHD) and sensory integration disorder, are caused by the toxic metal mercury, a key ingredient in a vaccine preservative called thimerosal. Through the Freedom of Information Act, parents of autistic children obtained numerous internal documents from CDC, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the Institute of Medicine, and the U.S. Congress regarding this connection between vaccines and autism. According to Generation Rescue, one such document is an email and spreadsheet from a CDC epidemiologist showing an extremely high correlation between mercury received through vaccines and autism, with the researcher writing that the correlation "just won't go away." Another is a transcript from a meeting held by CDC during which health officials reported that "the number of dose-related relationships [between thimerosal and autism] are linear and statistically significant" and that CDC's data should be kept out of "less responsible hands."

During the last decade, CDC, as the agency responsible for the National Immunization Program, dramatically increased the number of recommended immunizations for children, nearly tripling the amount of mercury injected into children and grossly exceeding federal safety standards. During this period, rates of autism also dramatically increased, and Generation Rescue reports that more than 1 in 150 children are currently diagnosed with autism, as compared to 1 in 10,000 in the 1970s.

FDA MedWatch announced a voluntary recall of all ACCU-CHEK Ultraflex Infusion Sets by the manufacturer, Disetronic Medical Systems, Inc. on April 4, 2006. The tubing for the units has a potenial to fully or partially separate at the luer lock-tubing connection, allowing insulin to leak and causing an interruption of insulin delivery. Hyperglycemia could result. Symptoms of hyperglycemia include:
- nausea/vomiting,
- blurred vision,
- excessive thirst or hunger,
- fatigue/tiredness/sleepiness,
- headache,
- fruity acetone breath,
- abdominal pain.
Patients with these symptoms should check their blood glucose level and follow the medical advice of their healthcare professional if the blood glucose level is not within the acceptable range.

Under this recall, customers may replace their ACCU-CHEK Ultraflex Infusion Set with ACCU-CHEK Tender of ACCU-CHEK Rapid-D infusion sets.

The complete MedWatch summary and press release is available at the FDA website.

For further information, contact ACCU-CHECK Customer Care Center or call 1-800-858-8072.

As recently reported in the Annals of Internal Medicine, there have been three cases of serious liver toxicity in individuals taking telithromycin (also known as Ketek). Telithromycin is an antibiotic of the ketolide class and was the first of this class to be approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in April 2004 for the treatment of respiratory infections in adults caused by the microorganisms Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae. These cases have been reported to MedWatch, the FDA's voluntary reporting system.

Telithromycin is marketed and used extensively in many other countries, including Japan and countries in Europe. FDA is continuing to evaluate the issue of liver problems in association with the use of telithromycin in order to determine if labeling changes or other actions are warranted. Moreover, FDA is exploring the frequency of liver-related adverse events reported for approved antibiotics in general in addition to telithromycin.

A recent series of articles in the New York Times reported strange new side effects in patients taking Ambien, one of the oldest and most prescribed sleep medications. "The articles cite recent studies by Carlos H. Schenck, MD, and colleagues at the Minnesota Regional Sleep Disorders Center. Schenck told the Times that he thinks thousands of U.S. Ambien users experience sleep-related eating disorders." Sleep eating disorders were first reported in 2002 by Michael H. Silber, MD, co-director of the Mayo Clinic Sleep Disorder Center and president-elect of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. During these episodes, patients prepare and eat food, but have no memory of it the following day. Other less common reported side effects include sleepwalking and sleep driving. The complete summary appears in WebMD.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently received verbal notification of two deaths in the United States following medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol. The notification was given by the drug's manufacturer, Danco Laboratories. While the FDA investigation is ongoing and the causes of these deaths have not been confirmed, the FDA has recommended that all providers of medical abortion and their patients be aware of the specific circumstances and directions for use of the drug as well as all attendant risks, including sepsis. In particular, providers and their patients should fully discuss early signs and symptoms that may warrant immediate medical evaluation, such as nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea, weakness with or without abdominal pain, all without fever or other signs of infection more than 24 hours after taking misoprostol.

As previously reported in its July 19, 2005 Public Health Advisory, updated on November 4, 2005, the FDA is aware of four previous confirmed deaths from sepsis in the United States, from September 2003 to June 2005, in women following medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol.

Information pertaining to these medications can be found at the FDA's Drug Information Page. For additional information regarding medication warnings in general, please visit the FDA's Medwatch site.

Recent news articles have discussed the ongoing investigation into the use of performance enhancing steroids by major league baseball players. This investigation has led to the FDA's heightened awareness of the dangers associated with steroids and their widespread use. Steroid use extends beyond professional athletes and includes high school and recreational athletes as well as dieters.

"The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warned several manufacturers and distributors of unapproved drugs containing steroids that are marketed as dietary supplements and promoted for building muscle and increasing strength that the products may cause serious long-term adverse health consequences in men, women, and children. These products claim to be anabolic and problems associated with anabolic steroids include: liver toxicity, testicular atrophy and male infertility, masculinization of women, breast enlargement in males, and short stature in children. Anabolic steroids are also associated with causing adverse effects on blood lipid levels, and a potential to increase the risk of heart attack and stroke.

Consumers who have any of the following products should stop taking them and return them to their place of purchase:

Anabolic Xtreme Superdrol- manufactured for Anabolic Resources LLC, Gilbert, Arizona
Methyl-1-P, manufactured for Legal Gear, Brighton, MI

Read the complete MedWatch 2006 Safety summary, including links to the FDA Press release and Warning Letters to manufacturers and distributors of illegal steroid products sold as dietary supplements at:

http://www.fda.gov/medwatch/safety/2006/safety06.htm#steroids"

"Mead Johnson and FDA notified the public of a recall of one lot, lot # BMJ19, of GENTLEASE powdered infant formula, found to contain metal particles up to 2.7 millimeter in size. If an infant were to inhale the infant formula into the lungs, the presence of these particles could present a serious risk to the infant's respiratory system and throat.

There were approximately 41,464 24-ounce cans of this lot of recalled product distributed, beginning on December 16, 2005, through many major retail stores across the country, so the consumer should concentrate on the code on the can rather than on the place of purchase. The affected products can be identified by the lot number and expiration/use by date embossed on the bottom of the can of BMJ19, use by 1 Jul 07. Consumers who have a can of this batch of GENTLEASE powdered infant formula should not use the product and should contact Mead Johnson at 888-587-7275 immediately."

To read the complete recall notice please go to:

http://www.fda.gov/medwatch/safety/2006/safety06.htm#gentlease

According to The Center for Drug Evaluation and Research of the U.S Food and Drug Administration, preliminary results of two important studies indicate that the popular antidepressant Paxil (also known as Pexeva or paroxetine) increases the risk of congenital defects, particularly cardiovascular malformations, when taken during the first trimester of pregnancy. Based on these findings, Paxil's pregnancy category has been changed from "C" to "D," indicating that studies show that its use in pregnant women have demonstrated an associated risk to the fetus. For these reasons, Paxil should generally not be initiated in women who are in their first trimester of pregnancy or in women who plan to become pregnant. Women already taking Paxil who become pregnant or who are currently in their first trimester of pregnancy should be alerted to the potential risk to the fetus and counseled regarding whether Paxil should be discontinued and possibly replaced by another antidepressant. For certain women, however, the benefits of continuing Paxil may outweigh the potential risk to the fetus. The FDA is currently awaiting the final results of the recent studies and accruing additional data pertaining to the use of Paxil in pregnancy in order to better characterize its associated risks. The FDA will provide updates as new information becomes available.

To view the FDA alert regarding the use of Paxil in pregnancy, please click here. To visit the manufacturer's website, please click on GlaxoSmithKline.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued a December 6, 2005, warning from MedWatch, the FDA's safety information and adverse event reporting program. According to the FDA warning, consumers are advised not to use the Miracle II Neutralizer and Neutralizer Gel products. These products are bacterially contaminated and have not been proven to be safe and effective. They are marketed as cleaners, deodorizers, natural insecticides and antibacterial agents. Despite the FDA notification, the manufacturer, Tedco, Inc., has declined to voluntarily remove the products from the market. The FDA's MedWatch program requests that any adverse events related to Miracle II products be reported by phone at 1-800-FDA-1088 or by using the FDA MedWatch online reporting form.

Tedco's promotional health claims for the Miracle II Neutralizer products were categorized by the FDA as "deceptive and untruthful." Although Miracle II naturalizer products have been promoted for treatment of cataracts and pinkeye, as well as an eyewash, FDA investigations revealed bacterial contamination and poor manufacturing conditions. Consumers are advised to discontinue using the products and dispose of them.

On January 26, 2006, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) issued a warning to consumers to immediately stop using and unplug the Maxi-Heat Dream Tower Heater. The model recalled is CH920 and was sold at Wal-Mart stores from August to December 2005. The wires in the oscillating heater may short-circuit and spark, creating a fire hazard. Consumers may return the heaters directly to Wal-Mart for a full refund. For additional information, call King of Fans, Inc. at (866) 443-1291 or visit http://www.kingoffans.com/.

"As the world's largest trial bar, the Association of Trial Lawyers of America (ATLA) promotes justice and fairness for injured persons, safeguards victims' rights--particularly the right to trial by jury--and strengthens the civil justice system through education and disclosure of information critical to public health and safety." Their website includes a useful resource for consumers regarding drug safety.

* Drug Safety News;
* Press Releases & Statements on Drug Safety;
* Fact Sheets on Drug Safety;
* Consumer News;
* Research on Drug Safety.

Defendant medical device maker Hillenbrand Industries Inc. reached a $337.5 million settlement in the antitrust lawsuit brought against it by plainitff Spartanburg Regional Healthcare System. Hillenbrand, which makes healthcare equipment and caskets, settled this suit which stems from a June 2003 complaint that the company's Hill-Rom unit's discounting practices harmed competition in the healthcare industry and resulted in higher prices for hospital beds and in-room products.

The settlement agreement has been approved by the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina. The settlement covers all of the plaintiff's claims as well as those of U.S. and Canadian purchasers or renters of Hill-Rom products from 1990 through the date of the agreement on February 3, 2006. All told, it is expected that this settlement will have a beneficial impact for healthcare consumers, who ultimately bear the brunt of costs that are passed along by healthcare providers such as Spartanburg.

On January, 27, 2006, the FDA and The First Years announced a voluntary recall of liquid-filled teethers. The fluid inside the teethers may possibly contain bacterial contamination, which could cause serious illness in children if the teether is punctured.

Consumers should immediately stop using the following products:
* Disney Days of Hunny Soft Cool Ring Teether--Style# Y1447
* Disney Soft Cool Ring Teether--Style# Y1470
* Disney Soft Cool Ring Teether--Style# Y1490
* The First Years® Cool Animal Teether/Fish, Zebra and Dinosaur designs--Style# Y1473
* The First Years® Floating Friends Teether-- Style# Y1474
* Sesame Beginnings™ Chill & Chew Teether-- Style# Y3095

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) is the government agency responsible for informing consumers about dangerous products. The introduction to the USPC website states:

"The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission is charged with protecting the public from unreasonable risks of serious injury or death from more than 15,000 types of consumer products under the agency's jurisdiction. Deaths, injuries and property damage from consumer product incidents cost the nation more than $700 billion annually. The CPSC is committed to protecting consumers and families from products that pose a fire, electrical, chemical, or mechanical hazard or can injure children. The CPSC's work to ensure the safety of consumer products - such as toys, cribs, power tools, cigarette lighters, and household chemicals - contributed significantly to the 30 percent decline in the rate of deaths and injuries associated with consumer products over the past 30 years."

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) has become a prevalent diagnosis among children in recent years. Consequently, numerous drugs have been developed and prescribed to children to treat this disorder. In October, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration withdrew approval for pemoline, a drug used to treat ADHD, because it has been associated with liver problems, including death. The drug was sold under the name Cylert and originally developed by Abbott Laboratories. Earlier this year, Abbott discontinued production of Cylert, but generic versions continued to be produced and remain available. Even though pemoline or Cylert has been associated with liver problems and death, the FDA did not recall the drug. Public Citizen, a consumer advocacy group, criticized the FDA's failure to issue a recall of the drug calling it "reckless and insensitive to the health and lives of children and adults using this drug . . .." For an additional story about Cyclert, also see the October 24, 2005 online edition of MSN Health & Fitness - Health Highlights .

The Cleveland Clinic, recently ranked by U.S. News & World Report as the best cardiac care center in the nation, will lead a massive international study to evaluate whether painkillers taken by millions of Americans for arthritis are safe for those who are also at risk for cardiovascular problems. The study will be led by Steven Nissen, M.D., who, incidentally, called for studies on the cardiovascular risks of Celebrex and Vioxx in a 2001 report. It is anticipated that it may take 18 months to enroll all of the 20,000 study participants, who will then be monitored for two years. The study will be funded by Pfizer Inc., the maker of Celebrex, a popular arthritis medication.

With an unusual mix of industry, academic researchers, and government oversight, the study aims to restore public confidence in pharmaceutical products. The credibility of research and drug safety assurances in particular has been called in to question by American consumers over the years. Public concerns have been amplified more recently, however, since products such as Vioxx and Bextra were withdrawn from the market due to evidence that they can raise the risk of a heart attack or stroke. "Since so many arthritis patients are at risk for heart disease, it is critically important to understand the cardiovascular safety of these drugs,'' said Dr. Nissen. "Currently available information is insufficient to determine whether typical dosages of celecoxib [Celebrex] and other popular pain relievers are linked to an increased risk of heart disease."

MedWatch is the safety information and adverse event reporting program for the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. According to FDA guidelines, consumers and healthcare professionals may use this website for timely safety information on drugs and other regulated medical products. In addition, consumers may register to receive notices of new warnings and complete online reporting forms for medical products and/or medications.

Baxter International Inc. recently announced its withdrawal of a medication delivery pump from the market over the next 12 months as it continues to struggle with problems in its pump business. The withdrawal of the 6060 Multi-Therapy Infusion pump follows Baxter's much larger recall in early 2005 of its Colleague Infusion and Syndeo PCA Syringe pumps, which are used to administer medication in hospitals.

For more information about this and other recalls of Baxter products, see the July 2005 Food and Drug Administration news release.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently acknowledged what experts have been saying for months: Ortho Evra (manufactured by Ortho-McNeil) birth control patches are dangerous. The agency warned that "women who use Ortho Evra are exposed to about 60 percent more estrogen than if they were taking a typical birth control pill." Increased estrogen means increased risks, including the increased risk of life-threatening blood clots.